On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 16:13 +0800, Hayes Wang wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Re-schedule napi after napi_complete() for tx, if it is necessay.
In r8152_poll(), if the tx is completed after tx_bottom() and before
napi_complete(), the scheduling of napi would be lost. Then, no
one handles the next tx until the next napi_schedule() is called.
Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang <redacted>
---
drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
index ec882be..45d168e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
@@ -1936,6 +1936,9 @@ static int r8152_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
napi_complete(napi);
if (!list_empty(&tp->rx_done))
napi_schedule(napi);
+ else if (!skb_queue_empty(&tp->tx_queue) &&
+ !list_empty(&tp->tx_free))
+ napi_schedule(&tp->napi);
Why using &tp->napi instead of napi here, as done 3 lines above ?