Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 6 authors, 2017-01-31

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] mlx5: Make building eswitch configurable

From: Saeed Mahameed <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-28 11:21:24

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:23 AM, Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] wrote:
On 1/27/17 1:15 PM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
quoted
It is only mandatory for configurations that needs eswitch, where the
driver has no way to know about them, for a good old bare metal box,
eswitch is not needed.

we can do some work to strip the l2 table logic - needed for PFs to
work on multi-host - out of eswitch but again that would further
complicate the driver code since eswitch will still need to update l2
tables for VFs.

Saeed,
for multi-host setups every host in that multi-host doesn't
actually see the eswitch, no? Otherwise broken driver on one machine
can affect the other hosts in the same bundle? Please double check,
each host (PF) has its own eswitch, and each eswitch lives in its own
"steering-space"
 and it can't affect others.
since this is absolutely critical HW requirement.
The only shared HW resources between hosts (PFs) is the simple l2 table,
and the only thing a host can ask from the l2 talbe (FW) is: "forward
UC MAC to me", and it is the responsibility of the the driver eswitch
to do so.

the l2 table is created and managed by FW, SW eswitch can only request
from FW, and the FW is trusted.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help