Re: [BUG/RFC] vhost: net: big endian viring access despite virtio 1
From: Halil Pasic <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-27 12:24:13
Also in:
kvm, virtualization
On 01/26/2017 08:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 06:39:14PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote:quoted
Hi! Recently I have been investigating some strange migration problems on s390x. It turned out under certain circumstances vhost_net corrupts avail.idx by using wrong endianness.
[..]
quoted
-------------------------8<--------------quoted
From b26e2bbdc03832a0204ee2b42967a1b49a277dc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From: Halil Pasic <redacted> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 00:06:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] vhost: remove useless/dangerous reset of is_le The reset of is_le does no good, but it contributes its fair share to a bug in vhost_net, which occurs if we have some oldubufs when stopping and setting a fd = -1 as a backend. Instead of doing something convoluted in vhost_net, let's just get rid of the reset. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <redacted> Fixes: commit 2751c9882b94 --- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index d643260..08072a2 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c@@ -1714,10 +1714,8 @@ int vhost_vq_init_access(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) int r; bool is_le = vq->is_le; - if (!vq->private_data) { - vhost_reset_is_le(vq); + if (!vq->private_data) return 0; - } vhost_init_is_le(vq);I think you do need to reset it, just maybe within vhost_init_is_le. if (vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) vq->is_le = true; else vhost_reset_is_le(vq);
That is a very good point! I have overlooked that while the
CONFIG_VHOST_CROSS_ENDIAN_LEGACY variant
static void vhost_init_is_le(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
{
/* Note for legacy virtio: user_be is initialized at reset time
* according to the host endianness. If userspace does not set an
* explicit endianness, the default behavior is native endian, as
* expected by legacy virtio.
*/
vq->is_le = vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) || !vq->user_be;
}
is fine the other variant
static void vhost_init_is_le(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
{
if (vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
vq->is_le = true;
}
is a very strange initializer (makes assumptions about the state
to be initialized).
I agree, setting native endianness there sounds very reasonable.
I have a question regarding readability. IMHO the relationship
of reset_is_le and int_is_le is a bit confusing, and I'm afraid
it could become even more confusing with using reset in one of
the init_is_le's.
How about we do the following?
static void vhost_init_is_le(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
{
if (vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
vq->is_le = true;
+ else
+ vq->is_le = virtio_legacy_is_little_endian();
}
static void vhost_reset_is_le(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
{
- vq->is_le = virtio_legacy_is_little_endian();
+ vhost_init_is_le(vq);
}
That way we would have correct endianness both after reset
and after init, I think :).
Thank you very much!
Halil