Re: [net-next 0/3] tipc: improve interaction socket-link

From: Jon Maloy <redacted>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 20:35:08 +0000

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org]
On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Monday, 16 January, 2017 14:45
To: Jon Maloy <redacted>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk; Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan
[off-list ref]; Ying Xue
[off-list ref]; maloy@donjonn.com; tipc-
discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [net-next 0/3] tipc: improve interaction socket-link

From: Jon Maloy <redacted>
Date: Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:26:45 -0500

quoted

We fix a very real starvation problem that may occur when a link
encounters send buffer congestion. At the same time we make the
interaction between the socket and link layer simpler and more
consistent.

This doesn't apply to net-next, also the Date in your emails is 10 days
in the past.  What's going on here?

I don't know. This series was sent in on Jan 3rd, and applied by you the same day. Maybe the mail server decided to send you a duplicate?

If you look in the headers, they have "Received-by: " fields with
January 13th in the date.  So something pushed them out again.

Really strange...