Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 04:18:20PM CET, jhs@mojatatu.com wrote:
On 17-01-15 10:01 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 03:01:19PM CET, jhs@mojatatu.com wrote:
quoted
quoted
+cls_set_class(struct tcf_proto *tp, unsigned long *clp,
??
quoted
unsigned long cl)
{
unsigned long old_cl;
-
+
??
quoted
tcf_tree_lock(tp);
old_cl = __cls_set_class(clp, cl);
tcf_tree_unlock(tp);
-
+
??
quoted
return old_cl;
}
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static inline int tcf_em_early_end(struct tcf_ematch *em, int result)
return 0;
}
-
+
??
All these things with "??" were annoying whitespace and stylistic
things my fingers couldnt resist. It is legit to include such changes
in a patch when touching the code (as long as not a bug fix).
Well, I think you should change this in a separate patch as it has 0
relation with this patch.