On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 16:27 -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:37:20 +0100
quoted
Here's another fix for something I noticed while reviewing the code
in
quoted
a new suggested patch that added another netlink socket destroy
path.
quoted
Since the new patch would otherwise cause conflicts, it might be
good
quoted
to pull net or Linus's next RC containing it into net-next, if you
can.
quoted
Please pull and let me know if there's any problem.
Pulled,
Thanks :)
I'll try to get this moving into net-next over the weekend.
Remind me about this early next week if that ends up slipping through
the cracks.
Actually, I just got the new version of the other patch and it turns
out that it's not necessary since the context for that new bit is small
enough to not have included the difference - so since you haven't done
that yet, no need to bother, sorry I didn't realize that earlier.
johannes