On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 11:11:31AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Leon Romanovsky <redacted>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:06:09 +0200
quoted
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 03:07:31PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Eli Cohen <redacted>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:03:18 -0600
quoted
If necessary I can make sure it builds on 32 bits as well.
Please do.
Dave,
I'm failing to understand the benefits of building mlx5 on 32 bits, and
see only disadvantages:
* It is actual dead code without test coverage.
* It misleads reviewers/customers by seeing code for 32 bits.
* It adds compilation time for 32 bits platforms and "punishes" them
for not relevant for them driver.
Why do you call removing all that as a "regression"?
We have this thing called "CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST", it has tons of value,
perhaps you've seen it before?
Thanks David,
I see your point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html