Re: [net/mm PATCH v2 0/3] Page fragment updates
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2016-12-27 18:55:34
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Alexander Duyck <redacted> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:54:14 -0800
Dave, I was wondering if you would be okay with me trying to push the three patches though net-next. I'm thinking I might scale back the first patch so that it is just a rename instead of making any functional changes. The main reason why I am thinking of trying to submit through net-next is because then I can then start working on submitting the driver patches for net-next. Otherwise I'm looking at this set creating a merge mess since I don't see a good way to push the driver changes without already having these changes present. I'll wait until Andrew can weigh in on the patches before resubmitting. My thought was to get an Acked-by from him and then see if I can get them accepted into net-next. That way there isn't any funky cross-tree merging that will need to go on, and it shouldn't really impact the mm tree all that much as the only consumers for the page frag code are the network stack anyway.
I'm fine with this plan. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>