Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fixed to BUG_ON to WARN_ON def
From: Ozgur Karatas <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-12 13:04:34
Also in:
lkml
Dear Romanovsky;
I'm trying to learn english and I apologize for my mistake words and phrases. So, I think the code when call to "sg_set_buf" and next time set memory and buffer. For example, isn't to call "WARN_ON" function, get a error to implicit declaration, right?
Because, you will use to "BUG_ON" get a error implicit declaration of functions.
sg_set_buf(mem, buf, PAGE_SIZE << order);
WARN_ON(mem->offset);
Thanks for information and learn to me.
Regards,
Ozgur Karatas
12.12.2016, 14:39, "Leon Romanovsky" [off-list ref]:On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Ozgur Karatas wrote:quoted
Hello all, I think should be use to "WARN_ON" and checkpatch script give to error, I fixed and I think should don't use "BUG_ON". Regards, Signed-off-by: Ozgur Karatas [off-list ref]NAK, Leon Romanovsky [off-list ref] If we put aside commit message issue, which was pointed to you by Stefan, your proposed change is incorrect. By chnaging BUG_ONs to be WARN_ONs, you will left the driver in improper state. Thanksquoted
--- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/icm.c | 4 ++-- diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/icm.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/icm.c index 2a9dd46..3fde535 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/icm.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/icm.c @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int mlx4_alloc_icm_coherent(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *mem, return -ENOMEM; sg_set_buf(mem, buf, PAGE_SIZE << order); - BUG_ON(mem->offset); + WARN_ON(mem->offset); sg_dma_len(mem) = PAGE_SIZE << order; return 0; } @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct mlx4_icm *mlx4_alloc_icm(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int npages, int ret; /* We use sg_set_buf for coherent allocs, which assumes low memory */ - BUG_ON(coherent && (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGHMEM)); + WARN_ON(coherent && (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGHMEM)); icm = kmalloc_node(sizeof(*icm), gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_NOWARN), -- 2.1.4