On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
[off-list ref] wrote:
First of all, +1 to (re-)use stmmac.
The stmmac drivers run since many years on several platforms
(sh4, stm32, arm, x86, mips ...) and it supports an huge of amount of
configurations starting from 3.1x to 3.7x databooks.
As Intel employee who did some clean ups to that, acknowledge above.
Concerning the stmicro/stmmac naming, these come from a really old
story and have no issue to adopt new folder/file names.
I don't think it would be best idea for platform driver (though we can
keep driver's name in the structure in async with file name).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko