Re: net/sctp: vmalloc allocation failure in sctp_setsockopt/xt_alloc_table_info
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: 2016-11-28 18:12:29
Also in:
lkml, netfilter-devel
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: 2016-11-28 18:12:29
Also in:
lkml, netfilter-devel
Neil Horman [off-list ref] wrote: [ trimming CCs ]
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 06:47:10PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:quoted
Neil Horman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
I'm not sure I agree with that. Generally speaking it seems like the right thing to do, if you want to avoid filling logs with warnings, but this is the sort of error that is going to be accompanied by severe service interruption. I'd rather see a reason behind that in the logs, than just have it occur silently.Its not silent -- the setsockopt call will fail and userspace should display an error.Thats not true. If the OOM succedes in freeing enough memory to fulfill the request the setsockopt may complete without error, you're just left with a killed process...somewhere. Thats seems a bit dodgy to me
We should prevent OOM killer from running in first place (GFP_NORETRY should work).