Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: fix fixed-link-phy device leaks
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-11-16 17:11:50
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:06:26AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 11/16/2016 06:47 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:quoted
Make sure to drop the reference taken by of_phy_find_device() when registering and deregistering the fixed-link PHY-device. Note that we need to put both references held at deregistration. Fixes: 39b0c705195e ("net: dsa: Allow configuration of CPU & DSA port speeds/duplex") Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> --- Hi, This is one has been compile tested only, but fixes a couple of leaks similar to one that was found in the cpsw driver for which I just posted a patch. It turns out all drivers but DSA fail to deregister the fixed-link PHYs registered by of_phy_register_fixed_link(). Due to the way this interface was designed, deregistering such a PHY is a bit cumbersome and looks like it would benefit from a common helper. However, perhaps the interface should instead be changed so that the PHY device is returned so that drivers do not need to use of_phy_find_device() when they need to access properties of the fixed link (e.g. as in dsu_cpu_dsa_setup below). Thoughts? Thanks, Johan net/dsa/dsa.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c index a6902c1e2f28..798a6a776a5f 100644 --- a/net/dsa/dsa.c +++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c@@ -233,6 +233,8 @@ int dsa_cpu_dsa_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct device *dev, genphy_read_status(phydev); if (ds->ops->adjust_link) ds->ops->adjust_link(ds, port, phydev); + + phy_device_free(phydev); /* of_phy_find_device */ } return 0;@@ -509,8 +511,12 @@ void dsa_cpu_dsa_destroy(struct device_node *port_dn) if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(port_dn)) { phydev = of_phy_find_device(port_dn); if (phydev) { - phy_device_free(phydev); fixed_phy_unregister(phydev); + /* Put references taken by of_phy_find_device() and + * of_phy_register_fixed_link(). + */ + phy_device_free(phydev); + phy_device_free(phydev);Double free, this looks bogus here. Actually would not this mean a triple free since you already free in dsa_cpu_dsa_setup() which is paired with dsa_cpu_dsa_destroy()?
The naming of phy_device_free() is unfortunate when it's really a put():
void phy_device_free(struct phy_device *phydev)
{
put_device(&phydev->mdio.dev);
}
which may need to be called multiple times, specifically after a call to
of_phy_find_device() which takes another reference.
With this patch the refcounts are properly balanced.
Johan