On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:31:06PM -0800, Vishwanathapura, Niranjana wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:05:09PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 06:13:50PM -0800, Vishwanathapura, Niranjana wrote:
quoted
In order to be truely device independent the hfi_vnic ULP should not depend
on a device exported symbol. Instead device should register its functions
with the ULP. Hence the approaches a) and b).
It is not device independent, it is hard linked to hfi1, just like our
other multi-component drivers.. So don't worry about that.
We would like to keep the design clean and avoid any tight coupling here
(our original design in this series tackled these).
Any strong reason not to go with a) or b) ?
You are not making a subsystem. Don't overcomplicate things. A
multi-part device device can just directly link.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html