From: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
Ido says:
In kernel 4.9 the switchdev-specific FIB offload mechanism was replaced
by a new FIB notification chain to which modules could register in order
to be notified about the addition and deletion of FIB entries. The
motivation for this change was that switchdev drivers need to be able to
reflect the entire FIB table and not only FIBs configured on top of the
port netdevs themselves. This is useful in case of in-band management.
The fundamental problem with this approach is that upon registration
listeners lose all the information previously sent in the chain and
thus have an incomplete view of the FIB tables, which can result in
packet loss. This patchset fixes that by introducing a new API to dump
the FIB tables.
The entire dump process is done under RCU and thus the FIB notification
chain is converted to be atomic. The listeners are modified accordingly.
This is done in the first seven patches.
The eighth patch adds a change sequence counter to ensure the integrity
of the FIB dump, which is finally introduced in the following patch. The
last two patches modify current listeners of the FIB notification chain
to invoke the dump during their init.
---
v1->v2:
- Add a sequence counter to ensure the integrity of the FIB dump
(David S. Miller, Hannes Frederic Sowa).
- Protect notifications from re-ordering in listeners by using an
ordered workqueue (Hannes Frederic Sowa).
- Introduce fib_info_hold() (Jiri Pirko).
- Relieve rocker from the need to invoke the FIB dump by registering
to the FIB notification chain prior to ports creation.
Ido Schimmel (11):
ipv4: fib: Export free_fib_info()
ipv4: fib: Add fib_info_hold() helper
mlxsw: core: Create an ordered workqueue for FIB offload
mlxsw: spectrum_router: Implement FIB offload in deferred work
rocker: Create an ordered workqueue for FIB offload
rocker: Implement FIB offload in deferred work
ipv4: fib: Convert FIB notification chain to be atomic
ipv4: fib: Allow for consistent FIB dumping
ipv4: fib: Add an API to request a FIB dump
mlxsw: spectrum_router: Request a dump of FIB tables during init
rocker: Register FIB notifier before creating ports
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c | 22 ++++
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.h | 2 +
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 88 ++++++++++++--
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.h | 1 +
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c | 78 +++++++++++--
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_ofdpa.c | 1 +
include/net/ip_fib.h | 6 +
include/net/netns/ipv4.h | 2 +
net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c | 2 +
net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c | 1 +
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++-
11 files changed, 303 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
The FIB notification chain is going to be converted to an atomic chain,
which means switchdev drivers will have to offload FIB entries in
deferred work, as hardware operations entail sleeping.
However, while the work is queued fib info might be freed, so a
reference must be taken. To release the reference (and potentially free
the fib info) fib_info_put() will be called, which in turn calls
free_fib_info().
Export free_fib_info() so that modules will be able to invoke
fib_info_put().
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
As explained in the previous commit, modules are going to need to take a
reference on fib info and then drop it using fib_info_put().
Add the fib_info_hold() helper to make the code more readable and also
symmetric with fib_info_put().
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Suggested-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
include/net/ip_fib.h | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
We're going to start processing FIB entries addition / deletion events
in deferred work. These work items must be processed in the order they
were submitted or otherwise we can have differences between the kernel's
FIB table and the device's.
Solve this by creating an ordered workqueue to which these work items
will be submitted to. Note that we can't simply convert the current
workqueue to be ordered, as EMADs re-transmissions are also processed in
deferred work.
Later on, we can migrate other work items to this workqueue, such as FDB
notification processing and nexthop resolution, since they all take the
same lock anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
FIB offload is currently done in process context with RTNL held, but
we're about to dump the FIB tables in RCU critical section, so we can no
longer sleep.
Instead, defer the operation to process context using deferred work. Make
sure fib info isn't freed while the work is queued by taking a reference
on it and releasing it after the operation is done.
Deferring the operation is valid because the upper layers always assume
the operation was successful. If it's not, then the driver-specific
abort mechanism is called and all routed traffic is directed to slow
path.
The work items are submitted to an ordered workqueue to prevent a
mismatch between the kernel's FIB table and the device's.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
@@ -593,6 +593,14 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_fib_flush(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp);staticvoidmlxsw_sp_vrs_fini(structmlxsw_sp*mlxsw_sp){+/* At this stage we're guaranteed not to have new incoming+*FIBnotificationsandtheworkqueueisfreefromFIBs+*sittingontopofmlxswnetdevs.However,wecanstill+*haveotherFIBsqueued.Flushthequeuebeforeflushing+*thedevice'stables.Noneedforlocks,aswe'retheonly+*writer.+*/+mlxsw_core_flush_owq();mlxsw_sp_router_fib_flush(mlxsw_sp);kfree(mlxsw_sp->router.vrs);}
@@ -1948,30 +1956,74 @@ static void __mlxsw_sp_router_fini(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)kfree(mlxsw_sp->rifs);}-staticintmlxsw_sp_router_fib_event(structnotifier_block*nb,-unsignedlongevent,void*ptr)+structmlxsw_sp_fib_event_work{+structdelayed_workdw;+structfib_entry_notifier_infofen_info;+structmlxsw_sp*mlxsw_sp;+unsignedlongevent;+};++staticvoidmlxsw_sp_router_fib_event_work(structwork_struct*work){-structmlxsw_sp*mlxsw_sp=container_of(nb,structmlxsw_sp,fib_nb);-structfib_entry_notifier_info*fen_info=ptr;+structmlxsw_sp_fib_event_work*fib_work=+container_of(work,structmlxsw_sp_fib_event_work,dw.work);+structmlxsw_sp*mlxsw_sp=fib_work->mlxsw_sp;interr;-if(!net_eq(fen_info->info.net,&init_net))-returnNOTIFY_DONE;--switch(event){+/* Protect internal structures from changes */+rtnl_lock();+switch(fib_work->event){caseFIB_EVENT_ENTRY_ADD:-err=mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_add(mlxsw_sp,fen_info);+err=mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_add(mlxsw_sp,&fib_work->fen_info);if(err)mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_abort(mlxsw_sp);+fib_info_put(fib_work->fen_info.fi);break;caseFIB_EVENT_ENTRY_DEL:-mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_del(mlxsw_sp,fen_info);+mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_del(mlxsw_sp,&fib_work->fen_info);+fib_info_put(fib_work->fen_info.fi);break;caseFIB_EVENT_RULE_ADD:/* fall through */caseFIB_EVENT_RULE_DEL:mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_abort(mlxsw_sp);break;}+rtnl_unlock();+kfree(fib_work);+}++/* Called with rcu_read_lock() */+staticintmlxsw_sp_router_fib_event(structnotifier_block*nb,+unsignedlongevent,void*ptr)+{+structmlxsw_sp*mlxsw_sp=container_of(nb,structmlxsw_sp,fib_nb);+structmlxsw_sp_fib_event_work*fib_work;+structfib_notifier_info*info=ptr;++if(!net_eq(info->net,&init_net))+returnNOTIFY_DONE;++fib_work=kzalloc(sizeof(*fib_work),GFP_ATOMIC);+if(WARN_ON(!fib_work))+returnNOTIFY_BAD;++INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&fib_work->dw,mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event_work);+fib_work->mlxsw_sp=mlxsw_sp;+fib_work->event=event;++switch(event){+caseFIB_EVENT_ENTRY_ADD:/* fall through */+caseFIB_EVENT_ENTRY_DEL:+memcpy(&fib_work->fen_info,ptr,sizeof(fib_work->fen_info));+/* Take referece on fib_info to prevent it from being+*freedwhileworkisqueued.Releaseitafterwards.+*/+fib_info_hold(fib_work->fen_info.fi);+break;+}++mlxsw_core_schedule_odw(&fib_work->dw,0);+returnNOTIFY_DONE;}
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
As explained in the previous patches, we need to process FIB entries
addition / deletion events in FIFO order or otherwise we can have a
mismatch between the kernel's FIB table and the device's.
Create an ordered workqueue for rocker to which these work items will be
submitted to.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker.h | 1 +
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Convert rocker to offload FIBs in deferred work in a similar fashion to
mlxsw, which was converted in the previous patches.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_ofdpa.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
@@ -2166,28 +2166,70 @@ static const struct switchdev_ops rocker_port_switchdev_ops = {.switchdev_port_obj_dump=rocker_port_obj_dump,};-staticintrocker_router_fib_event(structnotifier_block*nb,-unsignedlongevent,void*ptr)+structrocker_fib_event_work{+structwork_structwork;+structfib_entry_notifier_infofen_info;+structrocker*rocker;+unsignedlongevent;+};++staticvoidrocker_router_fib_event_work(structwork_struct*work){-structrocker*rocker=container_of(nb,structrocker,fib_nb);-structfib_entry_notifier_info*fen_info=ptr;+structrocker_fib_event_work*fib_work=+container_of(work,structrocker_fib_event_work,work);+structrocker*rocker=fib_work->rocker;interr;-switch(event){+/* Protect internal structures from changes */+rtnl_lock();+switch(fib_work->event){caseFIB_EVENT_ENTRY_ADD:-err=rocker_world_fib4_add(rocker,fen_info);+err=rocker_world_fib4_add(rocker,&fib_work->fen_info);if(err)rocker_world_fib4_abort(rocker);-else+fib_info_put(fib_work->fen_info.fi);break;caseFIB_EVENT_ENTRY_DEL:-rocker_world_fib4_del(rocker,fen_info);+rocker_world_fib4_del(rocker,&fib_work->fen_info);+fib_info_put(fib_work->fen_info.fi);break;caseFIB_EVENT_RULE_ADD:/* fall through */caseFIB_EVENT_RULE_DEL:rocker_world_fib4_abort(rocker);break;}+rtnl_unlock();+kfree(fib_work);+}++/* Called with rcu_read_lock() */+staticintrocker_router_fib_event(structnotifier_block*nb,+unsignedlongevent,void*ptr)+{+structrocker*rocker=container_of(nb,structrocker,fib_nb);+structrocker_fib_event_work*fib_work;++fib_work=kzalloc(sizeof(*fib_work),GFP_ATOMIC);+if(WARN_ON(!fib_work))+returnNOTIFY_BAD;++INIT_WORK(&fib_work->work,rocker_router_fib_event_work);+fib_work->rocker=rocker;+fib_work->event=event;++switch(event){+caseFIB_EVENT_ENTRY_ADD:/* fall through */+caseFIB_EVENT_ENTRY_DEL:+memcpy(&fib_work->fen_info,ptr,sizeof(fib_work->fen_info));+/* Take referece on fib_info to prevent it from being+*freedwhileworkisqueued.Releaseitafterwards.+*/+fib_info_hold(fib_work->fen_info.fi);+break;+}++queue_work(rocker->rocker_owq,&fib_work->work);+returnNOTIFY_DONE;}
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
In order not to hold RTNL for long periods of time we're going to dump
the FIB tables using RCU.
Convert the FIB notification chain to be atomic, as we can't block in
RCU critical sections.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
The next patch will enable listeners of the FIB notification chain to
request a dump of the FIB tables. However, since RTNL isn't taken during
the dump, it's possible for the FIB tables to change mid-dump, which
will result in inconsistency between the listener's table and the
kernel's.
Allow listeners to know about changes that occurred mid-dump, by adding
a change sequence counter to each net namespace. The counter is
incremented just before a notification is sent in the FIB chain.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
include/net/netns/ipv4.h | 2 ++
net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c | 2 ++
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
@@ -1219,6 +1219,8 @@ static int __net_init ip_fib_net_init(struct net *net)interr;size_tsize=sizeof(structhlist_head)*FIB_TABLE_HASHSZ;+atomic_set(&net->ipv4.fib_seq,0);+/* Avoid false sharing : Use at least a full cache line */size=max_t(size_t,size,L1_CACHE_BYTES);
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Commit b90eb7549499 ("fib: introduce FIB notification infrastructure")
introduced a new notification chain to notify listeners (f.e., switchdev
drivers) about addition and deletion of routes.
However, upon registration to the chain the FIB tables can already be
populated, which means potential listeners will have an incomplete view
of the tables.
Solve that by adding an API to request a FIB dump. The dump itself it
done using RCU in order not to starve consumers that need RTNL to make
progress.
For each net namespace the integrity of the dump is ensured by reading
the atomic change sequence counter before and after the dump. This
allows us to avoid the problematic situation in which the dumping
process sends a ENTRY_ADD notification following ENTRY_DEL generated by
another process holding RTNL.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
include/net/ip_fib.h | 1 +
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
@@ -1902,6 +1963,62 @@ int fib_table_flush(struct net *net, struct fib_table *tb)returnfound;}+staticvoidfib_leaf_notify(structnet*net,structkey_vector*l,+structfib_table*tb,structnotifier_block*nb,+enumfib_event_typeevent_type)+{+structfib_alias*fa;++hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(fa,&l->leaf,fa_list){+structfib_info*fi=fa->fa_info;++if(!fi)+continue;++/* local and main table can share the same trie,+*sodon'tnotifytwiceforthesameentry.+*/+if(tb->tb_id!=fa->tb_id)+continue;++call_fib_entry_notifier(nb,net,event_type,l->key,+KEYLENGTH-fa->fa_slen,fi,fa->fa_tos,+fa->fa_type,fa->tb_id,0);+}+}++staticvoidfib_table_notify(structnet*net,structfib_table*tb,+structnotifier_block*nb,+enumfib_event_typeevent_type)+{+structtrie*t=(structtrie*)tb->tb_data;+structkey_vector*l,*tp=t->kv;+t_keykey=0;++while((l=leaf_walk_rcu(&tp,key))!=NULL){+fib_leaf_notify(net,l,tb,nb,event_type);++key=l->key+1;+/* stop in case of wrap around */+if(key<l->key)+break;+}+}++staticvoidfib_notify(structnet*net,structnotifier_block*nb,+enumfib_event_typeevent_type)+{+unsignedinth;++for(h=0;h<FIB_TABLE_HASHSZ;h++){+structhlist_head*head=&net->ipv4.fib_table_hash[h];+structfib_table*tb;++hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(tb,head,tb_hlist)+fib_table_notify(net,tb,nb,event_type);+}+}+staticvoid__trie_free_rcu(structrcu_head*head){structfib_table*tb=container_of(head,structfib_table,rcu);
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Make sure the device has a complete view of the FIB tables by invoking
their dump during module init.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Unlike mlxsw, rocker only supports the reflection of routes pointing to
its own netdevs. Therefore, instead of requesting a FIB dump during
init, simply register the FIB notifier before creating the ports.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hidden> Date: 2016-11-23 16:00:46
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016, at 15:48, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted hunk
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Make sure the device has a complete view of the FIB tables by invoking
their dump during module init.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 16
++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
@@ -2027,6 +2027,21 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event(struct
notifier_block *nb,
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
+static void mlxsw_sp_router_fib_dump(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
+{
+ while (!fib_notifier_dump(&mlxsw_sp->fib_nb)) {
+ /* Flush pending FIB notifications and then flush the
+ * device's table before requesting another dump. Do
+ * that with RTNL held, as FIB notification block is
+ * already registered.
+ */
+ mlxsw_core_flush_owq();
+ rtnl_lock();
+ mlxsw_sp_router_fib_flush(mlxsw_sp);
+ rtnl_unlock();
+ }
+}
I think it is fine to use this kind of synchronization.
But I think that this part of the logic still belongs into the core
kernel. I still think it could happen that we will loop here
indefinitely because of a lot of routing updates and as such would need
to abort this loop after a number of tries.
I would like that the kernel has one function to do this decision
instead of later patching all users of this API. Do you think it is
worth it?
Bye,
Hannes
Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:00:00PM CET, hannes@stressinduktion.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016, at 15:48, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Make sure the device has a complete view of the FIB tables by invoking
their dump during module init.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 16
++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
@@ -2027,6 +2027,21 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event(struct
notifier_block *nb,
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
+static void mlxsw_sp_router_fib_dump(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
+{
+ while (!fib_notifier_dump(&mlxsw_sp->fib_nb)) {
+ /* Flush pending FIB notifications and then flush the
+ * device's table before requesting another dump. Do
+ * that with RTNL held, as FIB notification block is
+ * already registered.
+ */
+ mlxsw_core_flush_owq();
+ rtnl_lock();
+ mlxsw_sp_router_fib_flush(mlxsw_sp);
+ rtnl_unlock();
+ }
+}
I think it is fine to use this kind of synchronization.
But I think that this part of the logic still belongs into the core
Core does not know how driver handles the offloaded fibs. So only driver
knows how/if he needs to do flush in case of retry.
kernel. I still think it could happen that we will loop here
indefinitely because of a lot of routing updates and as such would need
to abort this loop after a number of tries.
In theory, it is possible, howevery quite unlikely.
I would like that the kernel has one function to do this decision
instead of later patching all users of this API. Do you think it is
worth it?
For the reason I stated above, I'm not sure that could be done...
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hidden> Date: 2016-11-23 16:59:06
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016, at 17:04, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:00:00PM CET, hannes@stressinduktion.org wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016, at 15:48, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Make sure the device has a complete view of the FIB tables by invoking
their dump during module init.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 16
++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
@@ -2027,6 +2027,21 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event(struct
notifier_block *nb,
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
+static void mlxsw_sp_router_fib_dump(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
+{
+ while (!fib_notifier_dump(&mlxsw_sp->fib_nb)) {
+ /* Flush pending FIB notifications and then flush the
+ * device's table before requesting another dump. Do
+ * that with RTNL held, as FIB notification block is
+ * already registered.
+ */
+ mlxsw_core_flush_owq();
+ rtnl_lock();
+ mlxsw_sp_router_fib_flush(mlxsw_sp);
+ rtnl_unlock();
+ }
+}
I think it is fine to use this kind of synchronization.
But I think that this part of the logic still belongs into the core
Core does not know how driver handles the offloaded fibs. So only driver
knows how/if he needs to do flush in case of retry.
Sure, but an abort function can be provided to the kernel anyway and the
driver can care about that.
quoted
kernel. I still think it could happen that we will loop here
indefinitely because of a lot of routing updates and as such would need
to abort this loop after a number of tries.
In theory, it is possible, howevery quite unlikely.
I think the "quite unlikely" already got us down the path to not using
rtnl_lock in the first place.
As I said, I am not sure about this as I didn't try any hardware
offloading before and delays how long it needs to be transferred to
hardware, but having a fail case for that seems like a nice improvement.
At the same time I know of Linux boxes running in internet exchanges
having several peers. The high update rates actually led to bgp
implementation specifying flap damping which is actually nowadays
considered harmful.
Seriously, while most of the time convergence in routing protocols is
good and most updates only hit the BGP user space table anyway and the
change is suppressed because recursive routing lookup idempotence, quite
unlikely events happen to the internet now and then:
http://research.dyn.com/2009/02/longer-is-not-better/, which caused *a
lot* of flapping and ongoing events on BGP routers throughout the world.
I agree it is unlikely that you have to refresh your hw dump during this
time, but who knows what customers do and what admins do in case
something like this happens. I just don't favor to looping endlessly
trying to sync up and getting into a stable state but tell the admin to
detach the control plane from the forwarding plane and sync up then.
That said, I think a sysctl for a maximum number of loops respected by
drivers that needs to do so, should be enough for the time being.
Bye,
Hannes
Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:59:05PM CET, hannes@stressinduktion.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016, at 17:04, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:00:00PM CET, hannes@stressinduktion.org wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016, at 15:48, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Make sure the device has a complete view of the FIB tables by invoking
their dump during module init.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 16
++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
@@ -2027,6 +2027,21 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event(struct
notifier_block *nb,
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
+static void mlxsw_sp_router_fib_dump(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
+{
+ while (!fib_notifier_dump(&mlxsw_sp->fib_nb)) {
+ /* Flush pending FIB notifications and then flush the
+ * device's table before requesting another dump. Do
+ * that with RTNL held, as FIB notification block is
+ * already registered.
+ */
+ mlxsw_core_flush_owq();
+ rtnl_lock();
+ mlxsw_sp_router_fib_flush(mlxsw_sp);
+ rtnl_unlock();
+ }
+}
I think it is fine to use this kind of synchronization.
But I think that this part of the logic still belongs into the core
Core does not know how driver handles the offloaded fibs. So only driver
knows how/if he needs to do flush in case of retry.
Sure, but an abort function can be provided to the kernel anyway and the
driver can care about that.
Ok, how?
quoted
quoted
kernel. I still think it could happen that we will loop here
indefinitely because of a lot of routing updates and as such would need
to abort this loop after a number of tries.
In theory, it is possible, howevery quite unlikely.
I think the "quite unlikely" already got us down the path to not using
rtnl_lock in the first place.
As I said, I am not sure about this as I didn't try any hardware
offloading before and delays how long it needs to be transferred to
hardware, but having a fail case for that seems like a nice improvement.
At the same time I know of Linux boxes running in internet exchanges
having several peers. The high update rates actually led to bgp
implementation specifying flap damping which is actually nowadays
considered harmful.
Seriously, while most of the time convergence in routing protocols is
good and most updates only hit the BGP user space table anyway and the
change is suppressed because recursive routing lookup idempotence, quite
unlikely events happen to the internet now and then:
http://research.dyn.com/2009/02/longer-is-not-better/, which caused *a
lot* of flapping and ongoing events on BGP routers throughout the world.
I agree it is unlikely that you have to refresh your hw dump during this
time, but who knows what customers do and what admins do in case
something like this happens. I just don't favor to looping endlessly
trying to sync up and getting into a stable state but tell the admin to
detach the control plane from the forwarding plane and sync up then.
That said, I think a sysctl for a maximum number of loops respected by
drivers that needs to do so, should be enough for the time being.
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hidden> Date: 2016-11-23 17:08:24
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016, at 18:04, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted
Sure, but an abort function can be provided to the kernel anyway and the
driver can care about that.
Ok, how?
I think just a sysctl ontop of this series is enough plus a pr_warn.
Rocker and mlxsw are responsible to loop for a maximum amount of time.
Otherwise, if more fancy, can we provide an
fib_inconsistency_notification function pointer in netdev_ops?
Bye and thanks,
Hannes
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hidden> Date: 2016-11-23 17:47:13
On 23.11.2016 15:34, Jiri Pirko wrote:
quoted hunk
From: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Commit b90eb7549499 ("fib: introduce FIB notification infrastructure")
introduced a new notification chain to notify listeners (f.e., switchdev
drivers) about addition and deletion of routes.
However, upon registration to the chain the FIB tables can already be
populated, which means potential listeners will have an incomplete view
of the tables.
Solve that by adding an API to request a FIB dump. The dump itself it
done using RCU in order not to starve consumers that need RTNL to make
progress.
For each net namespace the integrity of the dump is ensured by reading
the atomic change sequence counter before and after the dump. This
allows us to avoid the problematic situation in which the dumping
process sends a ENTRY_ADD notification following ENTRY_DEL generated by
another process holding RTNL.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
---
include/net/ip_fib.h | 1 +
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
Hmm, I think you need to read the sequence counter under rtnl_lock to
have an ordering with the rest of the updates to the RCU trie. Otherwise
you don't know if the fib trie has the correct view regarding to the
incoming notifications as a whole. This is also necessary during restarts.
You can also try to register the notifier after the dump and check for
the sequence number after registering the notifier, maybe that is easier
(and restart unregisters and does the same).
Bye,
Hannes
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:47:03PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
Hmm, I think you need to read the sequence counter under rtnl_lock to
have an ordering with the rest of the updates to the RCU trie. Otherwise
you don't know if the fib trie has the correct view regarding to the
incoming notifications as a whole. This is also necessary during restarts.
I spent quite a lot of time thinking about this specific issue, but I
couldn't convince myself that the read should be done under RTNL and I'm
not sure I understand your reasoning. Can you please elaborate?
If, before each notification sent, we call atomic_inc() and then call
atomic_read() at the end, then how can we be tricked?
Thanks for looking into this!
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hidden> Date: 2016-11-23 23:05:06
On 23.11.2016 20:53, Ido Schimmel wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:47:03PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
quoted
Hmm, I think you need to read the sequence counter under rtnl_lock to
have an ordering with the rest of the updates to the RCU trie. Otherwise
you don't know if the fib trie has the correct view regarding to the
incoming notifications as a whole. This is also necessary during restarts.
I spent quite a lot of time thinking about this specific issue, but I
couldn't convince myself that the read should be done under RTNL and I'm
not sure I understand your reasoning. Can you please elaborate?
If, before each notification sent, we call atomic_inc() and then call
atomic_read() at the end, then how can we be tricked?
The race I am suspecting to happen is:
<CPU0> fib_register()
<CPU1> delete route by notifier
<CPU1> enqueue delete cmd into ordered queue
<CPU0> starts dump
<CPU0> sees deleted route by CPU1 because route not yet removed from RCU
<CPU0> enqueues route for addition
sometimes later in the ordered queue:
delete route -> route not in hw, nop
add route from dump -> route added to hardware
The result should actually have been that route isn't in hw.
Bye,
Hannes
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:04:57AM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On 23.11.2016 20:53, Ido Schimmel wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:47:03PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
quoted
Hmm, I think you need to read the sequence counter under rtnl_lock to
have an ordering with the rest of the updates to the RCU trie. Otherwise
you don't know if the fib trie has the correct view regarding to the
incoming notifications as a whole. This is also necessary during restarts.
I spent quite a lot of time thinking about this specific issue, but I
couldn't convince myself that the read should be done under RTNL and I'm
not sure I understand your reasoning. Can you please elaborate?
If, before each notification sent, we call atomic_inc() and then call
atomic_read() at the end, then how can we be tricked?
The race I am suspecting to happen is:
<CPU0> fib_register()
<CPU1> delete route by notifier
<CPU1> enqueue delete cmd into ordered queue
<CPU0> starts dump
<CPU0> sees deleted route by CPU1 because route not yet removed from RCU
<CPU0> enqueues route for addition
Yea, I missed this trivial case... My mind was fixed on problems that
could happen after the dump already started. :(
Regarding your suggestion, I think the API will be more useful if we
don't bundle fib_register() and fib_dump() together. We can do the
following instead:
1) Sum 'fib_seq' (doesn't need to be atomic_t anymore) from all net
namespaces under RTNL
2) Dump FIB tables under RCU
3) Do 1) again
4) Compare results from 1) and 3) and retry (according to sysctl limit)
if results differ. Before each retry the module's callback (if passed)
will be invoked.
Sounds OK?
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hidden> Date: 2016-11-24 12:34:39
On 24.11.2016 09:47, Ido Schimmel wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:04:57AM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
quoted
On 23.11.2016 20:53, Ido Schimmel wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:47:03PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
quoted
Hmm, I think you need to read the sequence counter under rtnl_lock to
have an ordering with the rest of the updates to the RCU trie. Otherwise
you don't know if the fib trie has the correct view regarding to the
incoming notifications as a whole. This is also necessary during restarts.
I spent quite a lot of time thinking about this specific issue, but I
couldn't convince myself that the read should be done under RTNL and I'm
not sure I understand your reasoning. Can you please elaborate?
If, before each notification sent, we call atomic_inc() and then call
atomic_read() at the end, then how can we be tricked?
The race I am suspecting to happen is:
<CPU0> fib_register()
<CPU1> delete route by notifier
<CPU1> enqueue delete cmd into ordered queue
<CPU0> starts dump
<CPU0> sees deleted route by CPU1 because route not yet removed from RCU
<CPU0> enqueues route for addition
Yea, I missed this trivial case... My mind was fixed on problems that
could happen after the dump already started. :(
Regarding your suggestion, I think the API will be more useful if we
don't bundle fib_register() and fib_dump() together. We can do the
following instead:
1) Sum 'fib_seq' (doesn't need to be atomic_t anymore) from all net
namespaces under RTNL
You anyway only support init_net, no?
I didn't fully understood what you mean by sum? Using one for the whole
system?
We already have net->ipv4.rt_genid as a per-namespace routing change
counter, have you looked at that?
2) Dump FIB tables under RCU
3) Do 1) again
4) Compare results from 1) and 3) and retry (according to sysctl limit)
if results differ. Before each retry the module's callback (if passed)
will be invoked.
Sounds OK?
Ah, you want to sum up all the fib_seq from all namespaces. Now I got it.
Not sure if that is such a good idea actually. It might make problems
later on if offloading will maybe one day become a per-netns knob for
the respective admins.
But semantically it should work.
If it turns out to be much easier than doing it per-netns, I think this
approach should work.
Bye,
Hannes