Hi Sven,

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Sven Eckelmann [off-list ref] wrote:

On Montag, 21. November 2016 16:21:52 CET Feng Gao wrote:

quoted

Hi Sven,

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sven Eckelmann [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao-KlmEoCYek3zQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org wrote:

quoted

From: Gao Feng <redacted>

The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but
it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,

s/packe/packet/

What's this mean?

That there is a minor typo (*t* is missing) and this sed statement (when
applied only to the commit message) would fix it.

Thanks. I didn't thought it was sed statement.

David already marked this patch as "Under Review" in his patchwork. So I would
guess that he will accept this patch and not the batman-adv maintainers. And
maybe he will fix this small typo - or maybe not.

Kind regards,
        Sven

I would correct the typo in the patch for net-next.

Best Regards
Feng