Hi Andrew,
Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] writes:
+static int mv88e6320_stats_snapshot(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port)
+{
+ port = (port + 1) << 5;
+
+ return _mv88e6xxx_stats_snapshot(chip, port);
+}
Please move the above helper in its internal SMI file (port, global1 or
whatever) and keep the below wrapper in chip.c. The correct prefix will
avoid having a _ prefix.
+static int mv88e6xxx_stats_snapshot(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port)
+{
+ if (!chip->info->ops->stats_snapshot)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ return chip->info->ops->stats_snapshot(chip, port);
+}
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
static const struct mv88e6xxx_ops mv88e6175_ops = {@@ -3223,6 +3243,7 @@ static const struct mv88e6xxx_ops mv88e6175_ops = {
.port_set_duplex = mv88e6xxx_port_set_duplex,
.port_set_rgmii_delay = mv88e6352_port_set_rgmii_delay,
.port_set_speed = mv88e6185_port_set_speed,
+ .stats_snapshot = mv88e6xxx_stats_snapshot,
};
Is this expected? Doesn't look correct to me to use
mv88e6xxx_stats_snapshot here.
Thanks,
Vivien