Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] rxrpc: More fixes and adjustments

[PATCH net-next 0/7] rxrpc: More fixes and adjustments · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2016-09-30
[PATCH net-next 1/7] rxrpc: Actually display the tx_data trace retransmission note · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2016-09-30
[PATCH net-next 2/7] rxrpc: Switch to Congestion Avoidance mode at cwnd==ssthresh · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2016-09-30
[PATCH net-next 3/7] rxrpc: Reduce ssthresh to peer's receive window · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2016-09-30
[PATCH net-next 4/7] rxrpc: The offset field in struct rxrpc_skb_priv is unnecessary · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2016-09-30
[PATCH net-next 6/7] rxrpc: Keep the call timeouts as ktimes rather than jiffies · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2016-09-30
[PATCH net-next 7/7] rxrpc: Fix the call timer handling · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2016-09-30
[PATCH net-next 5/7] rxrpc: Remove error from struct rxrpc_skb_priv as it is unused · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2016-09-30
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] rxrpc: More fixes and adjustments · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2016-10-03
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] rxrpc: More fixes and adjustments · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2016-10-04
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] rxrpc: More fixes and adjustments · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2016-10-05

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2016-10-04 16:01:35
Also in: lkml

Hi Dave,

What's the procedure for sending more fixes at this point?  Do I send them
against net-next, since net doesn't contain the things to be fixed yet, or do
I wait for net to catch up?

David

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help