Re: [PATCH v2] ip6_tunnel: Clear IP6CB in ip6_tnl_xmit() after encapsulation
From: Shmulik Ladkani <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-28 16:08:11
Hi, On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:13:45 +0800 Eli Cooper [off-list ref] wrote:
So I think it is best that all the IP6CB gets cleared before it is pushed to the next layer.
Just a comparison to the ipv4 world:
All tunnels (udp/ip based) end up calling iptunnel_xmit(), which:
- scrubs the skb
- clears any IPCB residues
- installs the iphdr
- invokes ip_local_out()
OTOH ip6_tnl_xmit:
- scrubs the skb
- installs the ipv6hdr
- invokes ip6tunnel_xmit() - a thin wrapper to ip6_local_out()
* missing: clearing cb
And OTOH udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb:
- clears IPCB(skb)->opt and some IPCB(skb)->flags
(why these 2 explicitly? and why at this point? and IPCB is no longer
relevant...)
- installs the ipv6hdr
- invokes ip6tunnel_xmit() - a thin wrapper to ip6_local_out()
* missing: scrub, clearing cb
Maybe we should clear IP6CB in ip6tunnel_xmit(), rather than in every tunnel's codes?
This seems reasonable. A potential issue might be whether it needs to be done earlier, although I've reviewed current versions of both 'ip6_tnl_xmit' and 'udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb' and it looks okay. But please verify.
By the way, I don't see any point in setting IPCB(skb)->flags in udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb(). It will not be interpreted as IPCB any further past ip6tunnel_xmit(), even if it were not cleared. Plus, nothing seems to use these flags anyway.
This seems right. It was introduced in 6a93cc9052 "udp-tunnel: Add a few more UDP tunnel APIs". If you checkout that tree, you'll notice same treatment to IPCB(skb)->opt and IPCB(skb)->flags in l2tp_xmit_skb... maybe it was just copied ;-) Best, Shmulik