Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-10-19

Re: [PATCH net-next v12 2/9] openvswitch: add mac_proto field to the flow key

From: Pravin Shelar <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-19 05:11:32

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Jiri Benc [off-list ref] wrote:
Use a hole in the structure. We support only Ethernet so far and will add
a support for L2-less packets shortly. We could use a bool to indicate
whether the Ethernet header is present or not but the approach with the
mac_proto field is more generic and occupies the same number of bytes in the
struct, while allowing later extensibility. It also makes the code in the
next patches more self explaining.

It would be nice to use ARPHRD_ constants but those are u16 which would be
waste. Thus define our own constants.

Another upside of this is that we can overload this new field to also denote
whether the flow key is valid. This has the advantage that on
refragmentation, we don't have to reparse the packet but can rely on the
stored eth.type. This is especially important for the next patches in this
series - instead of adding another branch for L2-less packets before calling
ovs_fragment, we can just remove all those branches completely.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <redacted>
---
There are three possible approaches:

(1) The one in this patch.

(2) Use just a one bit flag indicating whether the packet is L3 or Ethernet
    (similar to the "is_layer3" bool in v11). The code would stay very
    similar to this patchset, the memory consumption would be the same.

(3) Use value of 14 for MAC_PROTO_ETHERNET. It would simplify things nicely,
    as ovs_mac_header_len would be identical to ovs_key_mac_proto, saving
    one comparison. Of course, this would mean that if other L2 protocols
    are added in the future, they can only have L2 header length different
    than 14. Sounds hacky, although I kind of like this.

After thinking about pros and cons, I implemented (1). Seems to be most
clear of the three options. But I'm happy to implement (2) or (3) if it's
deemed better.
I like approach taken by this patch.

Acked-by: Pravin B Shelar <redacted>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help