[PATCH net-next 11/11] net: dev: Improve debug statements for adjacency tracking
From: David Ahern <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-15 01:28:51
Also in:
intel-wired-lan, linux-rdma
Subsystem:
networking [general], the rest · Maintainers:
"David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-10-18 · [PATCH net-next 11/11] net: dev: Improve debug statements for adjacency tracking · David Ahern <hidden>
- 2016-10-12 · [PATCH net-next 11/11] net: dev: Improve debug statements for adjacency tracking · David Ahern <hidden>
Adjacency code only has debugs for the insert case. Add debugs for the remove path and make both consistently worded to make it easier to follow the insert and removal with reference counts. In addition, change the BUG to a WARN_ON. A missing adjacency at removal time is not cause for a panic. Signed-off-by: David Ahern <redacted> --- net/core/dev.c | 22 +++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 99a1cb432945..10fd42a833e6 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c@@ -5567,6 +5567,9 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev, if (adj) { adj->ref_nr += 1; + pr_debug("Insert adjacency: dev %s adj_dev %s adj->ref_nr %d\n", + dev->name, adj_dev->name, adj->ref_nr); + return 0; }
@@ -5580,8 +5583,8 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev, adj->private = private; dev_hold(adj_dev); - pr_debug("dev_hold for %s, because of link added from %s to %s\n", - adj_dev->name, dev->name, adj_dev->name); + pr_debug("Insert adjacency: dev %s adj_dev %s adj->ref_nr %d; dev_hold on %s\n", + dev->name, adj_dev->name, adj->ref_nr, adj_dev->name); if (netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list(dev, adj_dev, dev_list)) { ret = netdev_adjacent_sysfs_add(dev, adj_dev, dev_list);
@@ -5620,17 +5623,22 @@ static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev, { struct netdev_adjacent *adj; + pr_debug("Remove adjacency: dev %s adj_dev %s ref_nr %d\n", + dev->name, adj_dev->name, ref_nr); + adj = __netdev_find_adj(adj_dev, dev_list); if (!adj) { - pr_err("tried to remove device %s from %s\n", + pr_err("Adjacency does not exist for device %s from %s\n", dev->name, adj_dev->name); - BUG(); + WARN_ON(1); + return; } if (adj->ref_nr > ref_nr) { - pr_debug("%s to %s ref_nr-%d = %d\n", dev->name, adj_dev->name, - ref_nr, adj->ref_nr-ref_nr); + pr_debug("adjacency: %s to %s ref_nr - %d = %d\n", + dev->name, adj_dev->name, ref_nr, + adj->ref_nr - ref_nr); adj->ref_nr -= ref_nr; return; }
@@ -5642,7 +5650,7 @@ static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev, netdev_adjacent_sysfs_del(dev, adj_dev->name, dev_list); list_del_rcu(&adj->list); - pr_debug("dev_put for %s, because link removed from %s to %s\n", + pr_debug("adjacency: dev_put for %s, because link removed from %s to %s\n", adj_dev->name, dev->name, adj_dev->name); dev_put(adj_dev); kfree_rcu(adj, rcu);
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html