Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking

On 10/13/16 1:34 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:

Although I didn't like the "all-list" idea when Veaceslav pushed it
because it looked to me like a big hammer, it turned out to be very handy
and quick for traversing neighbours. Why it cannot be fixed?

The walks with possibly hundreds of function calls instead of a single
list traverse worries me.

I have been looking at this code for a week now. Every solution I came up with that solved the original problems introduced new ones -- usually with adjacency remove expecting an adjacency that did not exist. In the end I came to the conclusion it is not possible to maintain an all_adj_list when the upper tree can have multiple paths to the top device. If someone thinks otherwise I am happy to test a patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html