On 29/09/16 03:36, R. Parameswaran wrote:
I agree that something like 2. below would be needed in the long run (it
will need some effort and redesign -e.g. how do I lookup the parent tunnel
from the socket when receiving a PMTU update, existing pointer chain runs
from tunnel to socket).
quoted
2) Add code to handle PMTU events that land on the UDP tunnel
socket.
Another function pointer could be added to struct udp_sock, similar to
encap_rcv, such that the pmtu event could be handled by the UDP encap
protocol implementation.
James