Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 3 authors, 2016-09-28
STALE3551d
Revisions (6)
  1. rfc [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 [diff vs current]
  4. v4 [diff vs current]
  5. v5 current
  6. v6 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v5 5/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in xfrm_statistics_seq_show

From: Jia He <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-28 06:24:36
Also in: linux-sctp, lkml
Subsystem: networking [general], networking [ipsec], the rest · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Steffen Klassert, Herbert Xu, Linus Torvalds

This is to use the generic interfaces snmp_get_cpu_field{,64}_batch to
aggregate the data by going through all the items of each cpu sequentially.

Signed-off-by: Jia He <redacted>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_proc.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_proc.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_proc.c
index 9c4fbd8..dc0cea6 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_proc.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_proc.c
@@ -50,12 +50,18 @@ static const struct snmp_mib xfrm_mib_list[] = {
 
 static int xfrm_statistics_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 {
-	struct net *net = seq->private;
 	int i;
+	struct net *net = seq->private;
+	unsigned long buff[LINUX_MIB_XFRMMAX];
+
+	memset(buff, 0, sizeof(unsigned long) * LINUX_MIB_XFRMMAX);
+
+	snmp_get_cpu_field_batch(buff, xfrm_mib_list,
+				 net->mib.xfrm_statistics);
 	for (i = 0; xfrm_mib_list[i].name; i++)
 		seq_printf(seq, "%-24s\t%lu\n", xfrm_mib_list[i].name,
-			   snmp_fold_field(net->mib.xfrm_statistics,
-					   xfrm_mib_list[i].entry));
+						buff[i]);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.5.5
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help