Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 2 authors, 2016-09-27
STALE3552d
Revisions (6)
  1. rfc [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 [diff vs current]
  4. v4 current
  5. v5 [diff vs current]
  6. v6 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v4 4/7] proc: Reduce cache miss in sctp_snmp_seq_show

From: Jia He <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-26 08:12:06
Also in: linux-sctp, lkml
Subsystem: networking [general], sctp protocol, the rest · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Xin Long, Linus Torvalds

This is to use the generic interface snmp_get_cpu_field{,64}_batch to
aggregate the data by going through all the items of each cpu sequentially.

Signed-off-by: Jia He <redacted>
---
 net/sctp/proc.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c
index ef8ba77..0487c01 100644
--- a/net/sctp/proc.c
+++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
@@ -75,11 +75,15 @@ static int sctp_snmp_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 {
 	struct net *net = seq->private;
 	int i;
+	unsigned long buff[SCTP_MIB_MAX];
 
+	memset(buff, 0, sizeof(unsigned long) * SCTP_MIB_MAX);
+
+	snmp_get_cpu_field_batch(buff, sctp_snmp_list,
+				 net->sctp.sctp_statistics);
 	for (i = 0; sctp_snmp_list[i].name != NULL; i++)
 		seq_printf(seq, "%-32s\t%ld\n", sctp_snmp_list[i].name,
-			   snmp_fold_field(net->sctp.sctp_statistics,
-				      sctp_snmp_list[i].entry));
+						buff[i]);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.5.5
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help