Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 6 authors, 2016-09-19

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking

From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date: 2016-09-15 14:32:21
Also in: cgroups, linux-mm, lkml
Subsystem: control group - memory resource controller (memcg), the rest · Maintainers: Johannes Weiner, Michal Hocko, Roman Gushchin, Shakeel Butt, Linus Torvalds

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:17:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:34:24 +0800 kbuild test robot [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Johannes,

[auto build test ERROR on net/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc6 next-20160914]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
[Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base=<commit> (or --base=auto for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Johannes-Weiner/mm-memcontrol-make-per-cpu-charge-cache-IRQ-safe-for-socket-accounting/20160915-035634
config: m68k-sun3_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0
reproduce:
        wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make.cross ARCH=m68k 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_alloc':
quoted
quoted
(.text+0x4076): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
   net/built-in.o: In function `__sk_destruct':
quoted
quoted
sock.c:(.text+0x457e): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_free'
   net/built-in.o: In function `sk_clone_lock':
   (.text+0x4f1c): undefined reference to `mem_cgroup_sk_alloc'
This?
Thanks for fixing it up, Andrew.

I think it'd be nicer to declare the dummy functions for !CONFIG_MEMCG;
it also doesn't look like a hotpath that would necessitate the jump
label in that place. Dave, any preference either way?

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
---
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index ca11b3e6dd65..61d20c17f3b7 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -773,13 +773,13 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_wb_stats(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 #endif	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
 
 struct sock;
-void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk);
-void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
 bool mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages);
 void mem_cgroup_uncharge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
 extern struct static_key_false memcg_sockets_enabled_key;
 #define mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled static_branch_unlikely(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key)
+void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk);
+void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
 static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
 	if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && memcg->tcpmem_pressure)
@@ -792,6 +792,8 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 }
 #else
 #define mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled 0
+static inline void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk) { };
+static inline void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk) { };
 static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
 	return false;
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help