On 09/14/2016 11:08 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:03:18PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
quoted
On 09/14/2016 05:25 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:02:30PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
quoted
@@ -427,9 +427,6 @@ static void cpts_calc_mult_shift(struct cpts *cpts)
u64 ns;
u64 frac;
- if (cpts->cc_mult || cpts->cc.shift)
- return;
-
freq = clk_get_rate(cpts->refclk);
/* Calc the maximum number of seconds which we can run before
This hunk has nothing to do with $subject.
Sry, but I did not get your comment here :(
I'd happy to update patch according to your request, but could you provide more info here, pls?
You added that code in patch #7. Then you moved it in patch #8. You
could have made the code correct in patch #7 to begin with.
Do you mean
- if (cpts->cc_mult || cpts->cc.shift)
- return;
??
if yes then those changes are correct as from patch#7 point of
view, as from patch#8 because they are separate standalone changes.
In patch patch#7 it reasonable to ball out earlier, while in patch#8
it required to move forward a bit as I need to know maxsec.
Sry, that I'm bothering you with stupid questions.
--
regards,
-grygorii