From: Gao Feng <redacted>
When memory is exhausted, nfct_seqadj_ext_add may fail to add the seqadj
extension. But the function nf_ct_seqadj_init doesn't check if get valid
seqadj pointer by the nfct_seqadj, while other functions perform the
sanity check.
So the system would be panic when nfct_seqadj_ext_add failed.
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <redacted>
---
v2: Remove the unnessary seqadj check in nf_ct_seq_adjust
v1: Inital patch
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c
index dff0f0c..2c8e201 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c
@@ -16,9 +16,14 @@ int nf_ct_seqadj_init(struct nf_conn *ct, enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo,
if (off == 0)
return 0;
+ seqadj = nfct_seqadj(ct);
+ if (unlikely(!seqadj)) {
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
set_bit(IPS_SEQ_ADJUST_BIT, &ct->status);
- seqadj = nfct_seqadj(ct);
this_way = &seqadj->seq[dir];
this_way->offset_before = off;
this_way->offset_after = off;--
1.9.1