Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 5 authors, 2016-08-31

Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT program type

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2016-08-30 00:15:25
Also in: lkml

On 08/27/2016 04:31 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
Introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT programs that can be attached to
HW and SW perf events (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE and PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE
correspondingly in uapi/linux/perf_event.h)

The program visible context meta structure is
struct bpf_perf_event_data {
     struct pt_regs regs;
      __u64 sample_period;
};
which is accessible directly from the program:
int bpf_prog(struct bpf_perf_event_data *ctx)
{
   ... ctx->sample_period ...
   ... ctx->regs.ip ...
}

The bpf verifier rewrites the accesses into kernel internal
struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern which allows changing
struct perf_sample_data without affecting bpf programs.
New fields can be added to the end of struct bpf_perf_event_data
in the future.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Two things I noticed below, otherwise for BPF bits:

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

[...]
+static bool pe_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
+				    enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type)
+{
+	if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(struct bpf_perf_event_data))
+		return false;
+	if (type != BPF_READ)
+		return false;
+	if (off % size != 0)
+		return false;
+	if (off == offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data, sample_period) &&
+	    size != sizeof(u64))
+		return false;
+	if (size != sizeof(long))
+		return false;
Wouldn't this one rather need to be:

if (off == offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data, sample_period) {
	if (size != sizeof(u64))
		return false;
} else {
	if (size != sizeof(long))
		return false;
}

Otherwise on 32bit accessing sample_period might fail?
+	return true;
+}
+
+static u32 pe_prog_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type, int dst_reg,
+				      int src_reg, int ctx_off,
+				      struct bpf_insn *insn_buf,
+				      struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
+
+	switch (ctx_off) {
+	case offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data, sample_period):
Would be good to add a test as we usually have done:

BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct perf_sample_data, period) != 8);
+		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(bytes_to_bpf_size(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern, data)),
+				      dst_reg, src_reg,
+				      offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern, data));
+		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, dst_reg, dst_reg,
+				      offsetof(struct perf_sample_data, period));
+		break;
+	default:
+		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(bytes_to_bpf_size(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern, regs)),
+				      dst_reg, src_reg,
+				      offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern, regs));
+		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(bytes_to_bpf_size(sizeof(long)),
+				      dst_reg, dst_reg, ctx_off);
+		break;
+	}
+	return insn - insn_buf;
+}
+
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help