Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT program type
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2016-08-30 00:15:25
Also in:
lkml
On 08/27/2016 04:31 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
Introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT programs that can be attached to
HW and SW perf events (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE and PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE
correspondingly in uapi/linux/perf_event.h)
The program visible context meta structure is
struct bpf_perf_event_data {
struct pt_regs regs;
__u64 sample_period;
};
which is accessible directly from the program:
int bpf_prog(struct bpf_perf_event_data *ctx)
{
... ctx->sample_period ...
... ctx->regs.ip ...
}
The bpf verifier rewrites the accesses into kernel internal
struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern which allows changing
struct perf_sample_data without affecting bpf programs.
New fields can be added to the end of struct bpf_perf_event_data
in the future.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>Two things I noticed below, otherwise for BPF bits: Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> [...]
+static bool pe_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
+ enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type)
+{
+ if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(struct bpf_perf_event_data))
+ return false;
+ if (type != BPF_READ)
+ return false;
+ if (off % size != 0)
+ return false;
+ if (off == offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data, sample_period) &&
+ size != sizeof(u64))
+ return false;
+ if (size != sizeof(long))
+ return false;
Wouldn't this one rather need to be:
if (off == offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data, sample_period) {
if (size != sizeof(u64))
return false;
} else {
if (size != sizeof(long))
return false;
}
Otherwise on 32bit accessing sample_period might fail?
+ return true;
+}
+
+static u32 pe_prog_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type, int dst_reg,
+ int src_reg, int ctx_off,
+ struct bpf_insn *insn_buf,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
+
+ switch (ctx_off) {
+ case offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data, sample_period):Would be good to add a test as we usually have done: BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct perf_sample_data, period) != 8);
+ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(bytes_to_bpf_size(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern, data)), + dst_reg, src_reg, + offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern, data)); + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, dst_reg, dst_reg, + offsetof(struct perf_sample_data, period)); + break; + default: + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(bytes_to_bpf_size(FIELD_SIZEOF(struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern, regs)), + dst_reg, src_reg, + offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern, regs)); + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(bytes_to_bpf_size(sizeof(long)), + dst_reg, dst_reg, ctx_off); + break; + } + return insn - insn_buf; +} +