Re: [PATCH] bridge: Fix format string for %ul

Hello.

On 8/27/2016 6:58 PM, Oleg Drokin wrote:

quoted

quoted

%ul would print an unsigned value and a letter l,
likely it was %lu that was meant to print the long int,
but in reality the values printed there are just regular signed

  Signed? Then you need probably "%d" or "%i"…

They are signed in the struct definition, but in reality they
designate time, so could not be negative, I imagine?

    That doesn't matter. If the type is signed, it should be printed as signed.
Doesn't gcc complain about the format specifiers not matching the values passed?

quoted

quoted

ints, so just dropping the l altogether.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <redacted>

[...]

MBR, Sergei