On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:09:44PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 0805855..0456e0e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -732,6 +732,7 @@ static void cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status)
netif_receive_skb(skb);
ndev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
ndev->stats.rx_packets++;
+ kmemleak_not_leak(new_skb);
} else {
ndev->stats.rx_dropped++;
new_skb = skb;@@ -1323,6 +1324,7 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
kfree_skb(skb);
goto err_cleanup;
}
+ kmemleak_not_leak(skb);
Nitpick: I would add a short comment above the kmemleak_not_leak() calls
on why there is a false positive. Otherwise:
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>