Thread (30 messages) flat view 30 messages, 4 authors, 2016-08-09
STALE3662d

Revision v2 of 2 in this series.

Revisions (2)
  1. v2 current
  2. v3 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v2 05/14] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: don't check slave num in runtime

From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-06 20:13:56
Also in: linux-omap, lkml
Subsystem: networking drivers, the rest, ti ethernet switch driver (cpsw) · Maintainers: Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

No need to check const slave num in runtime for every packet,
and ndev for slaves w/o ndev is anyway NULL. So remove redundant
check.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 70a9570..19aa4bb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -498,8 +498,7 @@ static const struct cpsw_stats cpsw_gstrings_stats[] = {
 				(func)(slave++, ##arg);			\
 	} while (0)
 #define cpsw_get_slave_ndev(priv, __slave_no__)				\
-	((__slave_no__ < priv->data.slaves) ?				\
-		priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev : NULL)
+		priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev
 #define cpsw_get_slave_priv(priv, __slave_no__)				\
 	(((__slave_no__ < priv->data.slaves) &&				\
 		(priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev)) ?			\
-- 
1.9.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help