On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 09:41 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:

On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 09:32 -0700, Greg Rose wrote:

quoted

I'm not sure why this hasn't been done before because it seems obvious,
so maybe there is some reason that memcpy is used instead of
ether_addr_copy in this code.  But let's try this anyway.

Change memcpy to ether_addr_copy.

I looked at this once and gave up given the need to verify all
the possible callers that require an __aligned(2) source address.

Ha, I figured there must be some reason for it.  OK, patch withdrawn.

Thanks!