Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2016-08-31

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: bridge: add per-port multicast flood flag

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov via Bridge <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-31 06:14:46
Also in: bridge

On 31/08/16 08:02, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
On 31/08/16 03:37, Linus Lüssing wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 05:23:08PM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov via Bridge wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c
index 1da3221845f1..ed0dd3340084 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_if.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static struct net_bridge_port *new_nbp(struct net_bridge *br,
 	p->path_cost = port_cost(dev);
 	p->priority = 0x8000 >> BR_PORT_BITS;
 	p->port_no = index;
-	p->flags = BR_LEARNING | BR_FLOOD;
+	p->flags = BR_LEARNING | BR_FLOOD | BR_MCAST_FLOOD;
I'm discontent with this new flag becoming the default.

Could you elaborate a little more on your use-case, when/why do
you want/need this flag?
The use case is the current default behaviour if we don't make this flag on by default
then we'll change user-visible default behaviour. Right now we flood unregistered mcast
traffic by default (if there's no querier and router port, which continues to function
as before). Also we have the port flags equal to BR_AUTO_MASK by default.

Cheers,
 Nik
Actually there is one potential issue with br_auto_mask. I shouldn't change it because that
changes the requirement for a br_auto_port and it may change user-visible behaviour (e.g.
having to disable both unicast flood and multicast flood to get the same config for
auto ports).
I will drop that part of the patch later in v3, will wait for feedback until then.

Thanks
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help