Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-08-23

Re: [for-next V3 00/15][PULL request] Mellanox mlx5 core driver updates 2016-08-20

From: Doug Ledford <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-23 19:01:00
Also in: linux-rdma

On 8/23/2016 2:39 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 07:10:53PM +0300, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Doug Ledford [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 8/23/2016 4:49 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
From Hadar and Ilya, added the needed hardware bits and infrastructure for
minimum inline headers setting and encap/decap commands and capabilities,
needed for E-Switch offloads.
These looked fine to me, but aren't really in the RDMA area anyway.
Our internal goal is to have 0-merge conflicts between RDMA and net
trees.
Sure, I'm aware of that and fully understand it means that a single pull
like this will have mixed patches between the two.  I was just pointing
out that even though I looked at them and they looked OK to me based on
my cursory review, they are something DaveM needs to approve, not me.

-- 
Doug Ledford [off-list ref]
    GPG Key ID: 0E572FDD

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help