Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] l2tp: Refactor the codes with existing macros instead of literal number
From: Feng Gao <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-22 10:22:43
inline On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Guillaume Nault [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 11:52:27PM +0800, fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:quoted
From: Gao Feng <redacted> Use PPP_ALLSTATIONS, PPP_UI, and SEND_SHUTDOWN instead of 0xff, 0x03, and 2 separately. Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <redacted> --- v3: Modify the subject; v2: Only replace the literal number with macros according to Guillaume's advice v1: Inital patch net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c index d9560aa..65e2fd6 100644 --- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c +++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int pppol2tp_recv_payload_hook(struct sk_buff *skb) if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, 2)) return 1; - if ((skb->data[0] == 0xff) && (skb->data[1] == 0x03)) + if ((skb->data[0] == PPP_ALLSTATIONS) && (skb->data[1] == PPP_UI)) skb_pull(skb, 2); return 0;@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static void pppol2tp_session_sock_put(struct l2tp_session *session) static int pppol2tp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len) { - static const unsigned char ppph[2] = { 0xff, 0x03 }; + static const unsigned char ppph[2] = {PPP_ALLSTATIONS, PPP_UI};Minor nit: I'd prefer to keep the space after '{' and before '}'. I didn't want to bother you with this, but since it seems you'll have to repost...
I don't know if it is the coding style of Linux kernel.
quoted
struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct sk_buff *skb; int error;@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ error: */ static int pppol2tp_xmit(struct ppp_channel *chan, struct sk_buff *skb) { - static const u8 ppph[2] = { 0xff, 0x03 }; + static const u8 ppph[2] = {PPP_ALLSTATIONS, PPP_UI};Same here. BTW, I thought you also wanted to remove the static ppph variable from pppol2tp_xmit() / pppol2tp_sendmsg(), to directly assign skb->data[0/1] with PPP_ALLSTATIONS/PPP_UI.
If removed static ppph, there will be some codes which use literal "2" instead of sizeof ppph. Is it ok? Regards Feng