Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 1 author, 2016-08-10
STALE3636d
Revisions (60)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v1 [diff vs current]
  3. v1 [diff vs current]
  4. v1 [diff vs current]
  5. v1 [diff vs current]
  6. v1 current
  7. v1 [diff vs current]
  8. v1 [diff vs current]
  9. v1 [diff vs current]
  10. v1 [diff vs current]
  11. v1 [diff vs current]
  12. v1 [diff vs current]
  13. v1 [diff vs current]
  14. v1 [diff vs current]
  15. v1 [diff vs current]
  16. v1 [diff vs current]
  17. v1 [diff vs current]
  18. v1 [diff vs current]
  19. v1 [diff vs current]
  20. v1 [diff vs current]
  21. v1 [diff vs current]
  22. v1 [diff vs current]
  23. v1 [diff vs current]
  24. v1 [diff vs current]
  25. v1 [diff vs current]
  26. v1 [diff vs current]
  27. v1 [diff vs current]
  28. v1 [diff vs current]
  29. v1 [diff vs current]
  30. v1 [diff vs current]
  31. v1 [diff vs current]
  32. v1 [diff vs current]
  33. v1 [diff vs current]
  34. v1 [diff vs current]
  35. v1 [diff vs current]
  36. v1 [diff vs current]
  37. v1 [diff vs current]
  38. v2 [diff vs current]
  39. v1 [diff vs current]
  40. v1 [diff vs current]
  41. v1 [diff vs current]
  42. v1 [diff vs current]
  43. v1 [diff vs current]
  44. v1 [diff vs current]
  45. v1 [diff vs current]
  46. v2 [diff vs current]
  47. v1 [diff vs current]
  48. v2 [diff vs current]
  49. v1 [diff vs current]
  50. v1 [diff vs current]
  51. v2 [diff vs current]
  52. v2 [diff vs current]
  53. v1 [diff vs current]
  54. v2 [diff vs current]
  55. v1 [diff vs current]
  56. v1 [diff vs current]
  57. v1 [diff vs current]
  58. v1 [diff vs current]
  59. v2 [diff vs current]
  60. v1 [diff vs current]

[PATCH 8/9] netfilter: ctnetlink: reject new conntrack request with different l4proto

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: 2016-08-10 19:17:00
Also in: netfilter-devel
Subsystem: netfilter, networking [general], the rest · Maintainers: Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds 

From: Liping Zhang <redacted>

Currently, user can add a conntrack with different l4proto via nfnetlink.
For example, original tuple is TCP while reply tuple is SCTP. This is
invalid combination, we should report EINVAL to userspace.

Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index b9bfe64..fdfc71f 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -1894,6 +1894,8 @@ static int ctnetlink_new_conntrack(struct net *net, struct sock *ctnl,
 
 			if (!cda[CTA_TUPLE_ORIG] || !cda[CTA_TUPLE_REPLY])
 				return -EINVAL;
+			if (otuple.dst.protonum != rtuple.dst.protonum)
+				return -EINVAL;
 
 			ct = ctnetlink_create_conntrack(net, &zone, cda, &otuple,
 							&rtuple, u3);
-- 
2.1.4
Other recent patches touching these files
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help