On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Oliver Neukum [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 13:49 +0200, Kristian Evensen wrote:
quoted
@@ -428,10 +434,47 @@ int usbnet_cdc_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct
usb_interface *intf)
return status;
}
+ if (dev->net->dev_addr[0] & 0x02)
+ eth_hw_addr_random(dev->net);
+
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usbnet_cdc_bind);
+static int usbnet_cdc_zte_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct
usb_interface *intf)
+{
+ int status = usbnet_cdc_bind(dev, intf);
+
+ if (status)
+ return status;
+
+ if (dev->net->dev_addr[0] & 0x02)
+ eth_hw_addr_random(dev->net);
+
+ return 0;
+}
That really makes no sense.
Ops, my bad. Thanks for catching it. The check for random hw_addr
should only be in the zte_bind() function.
-Kristian