Re: [PATCH net-next 00/10] NCSI Support
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-07-07 17:32:15
On 07/02/2016 10:32 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
This series rebases on David's linux-net git repo ("master" branch). It's
to support NCSI stack on net/farady/ftgmac100.c
The following figure gives an example about how NCSI is deployed: The NCSI is
specified by DSP0222, which can be downloaded from the following link here
(http://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP0222_1.0.0.pdf).
* The NC-SI (aka NCSI) is defined as the interface between a (Base) Management
Controller (BMC) and one or multiple Network Controlers (NC) on host side.
The interface is responsible for providing external network connectivity
for BMC.
* Each BMC can connect to multiple packages, up to 8. Each package can have
multiple channels, up to 32. Every package and channel are identified by
3-bits and 5-bits in NCSI packet. At one moment, one channel is active to
provide service.
* NCSI packet, encapsulated in ethernet frame, has 0x88F8 in the protocol
field. The destination MAC address should be 0xFF's while the source MAC
address can be arbitrary one.
* NCSI packets are classified to command, response, AEN (Asynchronous Event
Notification). Commands are sent from BMC to host for configuration and
information retrival. Responses, corresponding to commands, are sent from
host to BMC for confirmation and requested information. One command should
have one and only one response. AEN is sent from host to BMC for notification
(e.g. link down on active channel) so that BMC can take appropriate action.
+------------------+ +----------------------------------------------+
| | | Host |
| BMC | | |
| | | +-------------------+ +-------------------+ |
| +---------+ | | | Package-A | | Package-B | |
| | | | | +---------+---------+ +-------------------+ |
| | NIC | | | | Channel | Channel | | Channel | Channel | |
+----+----+----+---+ +-+---------+---------+--+---------+---------+-+
| | |
| | |
+-----------------------------+----------------------+
The design for the patchset is highlighted as below:
* The NCSI interface is abstracted with "struct ncsi_dev". It's registered
when net_device is created, started to work by calling ncsi_start_dev()
when net_device is opened (ndo_open()). For the first time, NCSI packets
are sent and received to/from the far end (host in above figure) to probe
available NCSI packages and channels. After that, one channel is chosen as
active one to provide service.
* The NCSI stack is driven by workqueue and state machine internally.
* AEN (Asychronous Event Notification) might be received from the far end
(host). The currently active NCSI channel fails over to another available
one if possible. Otherwise, the NCSI channel is out of service.
* NCSI stack should be configurable through netlink or another mechanism,
but it's not implemented in this patchset. It's something TBD.
* The first NIC driver that is aware of NCSI: drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.cI know nothing about NCSI, pretty much like Jon Snow, but from a cursory look at your patches, is not there a way to make the NCSCI capable network devices strictly adhere to the net_device APIs and calling conventions? Even if the data flow is a little different than normal ethernet frames, and there is not a good way to trap to intercept the delivery of NCSI packets, one could imagine doing something ala DSA where you register a fake ethertype for NCSI to hook a ptype_fun packet handler, augment struct net_device with a ncsi_dev pointer, and do processing in net/nsci/ for this device you know where the packet came from. You don't need to have an officially assigned ethertype for this, see netdev_uses_dsa() which just tests whether the traffic is tagged with a particular tag and delivers packet to a protocol specific parser in net/dsa/. For packets on their way out you could imagine assigning them a specific skb->protocol value and have the driver's transmit path do specific things based on that. Just an idea, I am not even sure this makes sense here, but what seems to make sens to me is that if more network device drivers end up supporting and transporting NCSI, we barely want them to know about that. -- Florian