Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: PHY: Add PHY LED control binding.
From: Hauke Mehrtens <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-09 20:13:28
Also in:
linux-devicetree
On 06/09/2016 08:12 AM, John Crispin wrote:
On 09/06/2016 08:06, Alexander Stein wrote:quoted
On Wednesday 08 June 2016 14:30:08, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-leds.txtb/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-leds.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1a35e3d--- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-leds.txt@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +LED configuration for Ethernet phys + +All these properties are optional, not all properties are supported by +all PHYs. When more then one property name is define for one LED the +order they get applied is device depended. +Property names: + led-const-on: conditions the LED should be constant on + led-pulse: condition the LED should be pulsed on + led-blink-slow: condition the LED should slowly blinkHow slow is slow?This depends on the MMD.INTERNAL.LEDCH.SBF setting which is 2 Hz by default.quoted
quoted
+ led-blink-fast: condition the LED should fast blinkHow fast is fast?This depends on the MMD.INTERNAL.LEDCH.FBF setting which is 16 Hz by default. Both can be set independently to 2, 4, 8 or 16 Hz.and both are intel/lantiq implementation specific and hence should not be part of a generic led-phy binding.
Ok, I can remove them, I think the constant on and the pulse are used by many Ethernet PHYs.
imho these leds should be exposed via a led driver and the configurtion should be exposed via a led driver specific trigger, in the same manner in which wireless macs do it.
Where is a good example on how this is done? Is this then also triggered by the hardware or does the software has to trigger it? Hauke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html