Re: [PATCH] rxrpc: fix uninitialized variable use

Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I'm actually more tempted to put a BUG() in there because if any new family
support (say AF_INET6) is added, I want to make sure I catch all the places.

Makes sense. Do you want to do the patch yourself, or should I send
a new one doing that?

Maybe WARN() would be better than BUG()? That would still get the attention
it needs but not kill the process.

I can stick a WARN() into your patch.

David