On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 7:04:54 PM CEST Saeed Mahameed wrote:
Ok, I see. It would be nice if the process had a way to avoid build regressions
in linux-next, in particular if you already have a fix by the time a patch
that introduces a problem gets added.
The reason we added this tree is to get 0-day testing but currently it
makes some unwanted noise
so we will remove it until we figure it out.
Can you check if the fix for the second problem correctly removes the
unnecessary 64-bit division (as opposed to adding a call to div_s64()
or do_div()), and if it removes all traces of 'struct timespec' again?
Yes, same thing, already fixed, will reply to that thread.