[net-next 01/15] fm10k: don't use BIT() macro where the value isn't a bitmask
From: Jeff Kirsher <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-29 21:33:06
Subsystem:
intel ethernet drivers, networking drivers, the rest · Maintainers:
Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel, Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> The FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD is really just using a bitshift as a power of 2 operation in an efficient manner. We shouldn't represent this as a BIT() because that obscures the intention of the operation. Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <redacted> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h
index fcf106e..e98b86b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static inline u16 fm10k_desc_unused(struct fm10k_ring *ring) (&(((union fm10k_rx_desc *)((R)->desc))[i])) #define FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR 14 -#define FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD BIT(FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR) +#define FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD (1u << FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR) /* Tx Descriptors needed, worst case */ #define TXD_USE_COUNT(S) DIV_ROUND_UP((S), FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD)
--
2.5.5