Thread (7 messages) flat view 7 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-16

Re: [PATCH net] ixgbe: napi_poll must return the work done

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: 2016-06-15 15:43:51
Also in: intel-wired-lan

On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 08:20 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Paolo Abeni [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Currently the function ixgbe_poll() returns 0 when it clean completely
the rx rings, but this foul budget accounting in core code.
Fix this returning the actual work done, capped to weight - 1, since
the core doesn't allow to return the full budget when the driver modifies
the napi status

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
I think the origin of reporting 0 was actually compatibility with some
NAPI code floating around from before the 2.6.24 kernel.

I'd be curious to know how much this is actually fouling things up.
Can you point to any specific issues it was causing?  
I noticed this while instrumenting the napi poll loop for another
patch. 

It's not easy to reproduce the bugged scenario, several NICs receiving a
relevant amount of traffic on napi instances scheduled on the same
softirq are needed. 

If any/some of them has the buggy poll() method, the napi_poll() loop
may process (much) more than netdev_budget packets per invocation,
possibly delaying others softirq more than needed/expected. 

The maxium delay will be no matter what capped to a couple of jiffies,
due to the time-based loop end condition, so in the worst possible
scenario (most probably not a real thing), this adds a latency of 2
jiffies - <time required to process netdev_budget packets> (~1.8ms on
recent h/w with HZ==1000).
If you end up
having to submit a v2 for any reason it might be useful if you can
provide the additional details on what actual issue it was causing.

You might also want to look at the other Intel drivers, specifically
ixgbevf and fm10k as I believe we have similar code in those drivers
as well.
Thank you for the head-up. I need to get an hand on that h/w, first!

Paolo
Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <redacted>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help