Hi Alex,
very cool series!
On 13.06.2016 19:48, Alexander Duyck wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index d101e4d904ba..e959b6348f91 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -1269,6 +1269,14 @@ struct net_device_ops {
void (*ndo_del_geneve_port)(struct net_device *dev,
sa_family_t sa_family,
__be16 port);
+ void (*ndo_add_udp_enc_port)(struct net_device *dev,
+ sa_family_t sa_family,
+ __be16 port,
+ unsigned int type);
+ void (*ndo_del_udp_enc_port)(struct net_device *dev,
+ sa_family_t sa_family,
+ __be16 port,
+ unsigned int type);
void* (*ndo_dfwd_add_station)(struct net_device *pdev,
struct net_device *dev);
void (*ndo_dfwd_del_station)(struct net_device *pdev,
What do you think about adding a struct as argument to
ndo_*_udp_enc_port? As a result we can much easier add new fields in
case future NICs allow us to e.g. specify a bound ip address?
Thanks,
Hannes