On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:13:35PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 06/07/2016 02:51 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
quoted
quoted
+int dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_setup(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
+ struct dsa_switch *ds)
+{
+ struct net_device *master;
+ struct ethtool_ops *cpu_ops;
+
+ master = ds->dst->master_netdev;
You pass in dst as a parameter, and then don't use it!
I do use it here:
memcpy(&dst->master_ethtool_ops, master->ethtool_ops,
sizeof(struct ethtool_ops));
Yes, i noticed this. I also expect the compiler has also noticed, and
has optimized away one of the parameters.
I sure could simplify that and use ds->dst instead if you find it more
elegant, works for me.
I would prefer the code to be consistent. Either use ds->dst
everywhere and drop the parameter, or use the parameter everywhere it
is usable.
Thanks
Andrew