Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the arm64 tree
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2016-05-17 13:49:16
Also in:
linux-next, lkml
On 05/17/2016 03:38 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:12:34AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:quoted
On 05/17/2016 09:03 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: [...]quoted
Someone's not gonna be happy with commit 6077776b5908 ("bpf: split HAVE_BPF_JIT into cBPF and eBPF variant") breaking the sort order again...Wasn't aware of that. Maybe I'm missing something, but there appears to be no throughout consistent ordering ... [...] select HAVE_PERF_REGS select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS select IOMMU_DMA if IOMMU_SUPPORT select IRQ_DOMAIN select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING [...] select RTC_LIB select SPARSE_IRQ select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING select HAVE_ARM_SMCCC [...]We keep fixing them as we merge other stuff. For example, latest mainline has commit 8ee708792e1c ("arm64: Kconfig: remove redundant HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE definition") which also fixes up the Kconfig order.
Understood, thanks for the clarification (and sorry for the sort order issue).