Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] nl80211: Various checkpatch.pl spacing fixes

[PATCH v2 00/10] nl80211: Fix checkpatch.pl issues · Kirtika Ruchandani <hidden> · 2016-05-30
[PATCH v2 05/10] nl80211: Fix checkpatch.pl NULL comparison warning · Kirtika Ruchandani <hidden> · 2016-05-30
Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] nl80211: Fix checkpatch.pl NULL comparison warning · Julian Calaby <hidden> · 2016-05-30
[PATCH v2 06/10] nl80211: Various checkpatch.pl spacing fixes · Kirtika Ruchandani <hidden> · 2016-05-30
Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] nl80211: Various checkpatch.pl spacing fixes · Julian Calaby <hidden> · 2016-05-30
Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] nl80211: Various checkpatch.pl spacing fixes · Kirtika Ruchandani <hidden> · 2016-05-30
Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] nl80211: Various checkpatch.pl spacing fixes · Julian Calaby <hidden> · 2016-05-30
Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] nl80211: Various checkpatch.pl spacing fixes · Julian Calaby <hidden> · 2016-05-30
[PATCH v2 07/10] nl80211: Avoid multiple assignments on same line · Kirtika Ruchandani <hidden> · 2016-05-30
[PATCH v2 10/10] nl80211: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc · Kirtika Ruchandani <hidden> · 2016-05-30

From: Kirtika Ruchandani <hidden>
Date: 2016-05-30 06:04:50
Also in: linux-wireless

Adding the brackets around the & expression doesn't look spacing
related to me. What's the exact warning this is fixing?

From the commit message - "This patch also contains two hunks to fix

'line over 80 characters',
that are spacing related". This is the second hunk, the first being
the comments in the nl80211_fam
definition. Should I resend with these two hunks omitted, or fix my wording?

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help