Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost: lockless enqueuing
From: Pankaj Gupta <hidden>
Date: 2016-04-26 06:24:22
Also in:
kvm, lkml
Hi Jason, Overall patches look good. Just one doubt I have is below:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
We use spinlock to synchronize the work list now which may cause unnecessary contentions. So this patch switch to use llist to remove this contention. Pktgen tests shows about 5% improvement: Before: ~1300000 pps After: ~1370000 pps Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 7 ++++--- 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index 73dd16d..0061a7b 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int vhost_poll_wakeup(wait_queue_t *wait, unsignedmode, int sync, void vhost_work_init(struct vhost_work *work, vhost_work_fn_t fn) { - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&work->node); + clear_bit(VHOST_WORK_QUEUED, &work->flags); work->fn = fn; init_waitqueue_head(&work->done); }@@ -246,15 +246,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_poll_flush); void vhost_work_queue(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_work *work) { - unsigned long flags; + if (!dev->worker) + return; - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->work_lock, flags); - if (list_empty(&work->node)) { - list_add_tail(&work->node, &dev->work_list); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags); + if (!test_and_set_bit(VHOST_WORK_QUEUED, &work->flags)) { + /* We can only add the work to the list after we're + * sure it was not in the list. + */ + smp_mb(); + llist_add(&work->node, &dev->work_list); wake_up_process(dev->worker); - } else { - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags); } } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_work_queue);@@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_work_queue); /* A lockless hint for busy polling code to exit the loop */ bool vhost_has_work(struct vhost_dev *dev) { - return !list_empty(&dev->work_list); + return !llist_empty(&dev->work_list); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_has_work);@@ -305,7 +306,8 @@ static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev, static int vhost_worker(void *data) { struct vhost_dev *dev = data; - struct vhost_work *work = NULL; + struct vhost_work *work, *work_next; + struct llist_node *node; mm_segment_t oldfs = get_fs(); set_fs(USER_DS);@@ -315,29 +317,25 @@ static int vhost_worker(void *data) /* mb paired w/ kthread_stop */ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - spin_lock_irq(&dev->work_lock); - if (kthread_should_stop()) { - spin_unlock_irq(&dev->work_lock); __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); break; } - if (!list_empty(&dev->work_list)) { - work = list_first_entry(&dev->work_list, - struct vhost_work, node); - list_del_init(&work->node); - } else - work = NULL; - spin_unlock_irq(&dev->work_lock); - if (work) { + node = llist_del_all(&dev->work_list); + if (!node) + schedule(); + + node = llist_reverse_order(node);
Can we avoid llist reverse here?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ /* make sure flag is seen after deletion */ + smp_wmb(); + llist_for_each_entry_safe(work, work_next, node, node) { + clear_bit(VHOST_WORK_QUEUED, &work->flags); __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); work->fn(work); if (need_resched()) schedule(); - } else - schedule(); - + } } unuse_mm(dev->mm); set_fs(oldfs);@@ -398,9 +396,9 @@ void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, dev->log_file = NULL; dev->memory = NULL; dev->mm = NULL; - spin_lock_init(&dev->work_lock); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->work_list); dev->worker = NULL; + init_llist_head(&dev->work_list); + for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) { vq = dev->vqs[i];@@ -566,7 +564,7 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev, boollocked) /* No one will access memory at this point */ kvfree(dev->memory); dev->memory = NULL; - WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dev->work_list)); + WARN_ON(!llist_empty(&dev->work_list)); if (dev->worker) { kthread_stop(dev->worker); dev->worker = NULL;diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h index d36d8be..6690e64 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h@@ -15,13 +15,15 @@ struct vhost_work; typedef void (*vhost_work_fn_t)(struct vhost_work *work); +#define VHOST_WORK_QUEUED 1 struct vhost_work { - struct list_head node; + struct llist_node node; vhost_work_fn_t fn; wait_queue_head_t done; int flushing; unsigned queue_seq; unsigned done_seq; + unsigned long flags; }; /* Poll a file (eventfd or socket) */@@ -126,8 +128,7 @@ struct vhost_dev { int nvqs; struct file *log_file; struct eventfd_ctx *log_ctx; - spinlock_t work_lock; - struct list_head work_list; + struct llist_head work_list; struct task_struct *worker; }; --1.8.3.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html