Re: Question on rhashtable in worst-case scenario.
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2016-03-31 07:50:29
Also in:
linux-wireless, lkml
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:46:45AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
In this case, I think perhaps you can just patch your local system with the many interfaces connecting to the same AP to add the parameter Herbert suggested (.insecure_elasticity = true in sta_rht_params). This is, after all, very much a case that "normal" operation doesn't even get close to.
I think you should just turn it on everywhere for mac80211. Chain length checks simply don't make sense when you allow duplicate keys in the hash table. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu [off-list ref] Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt