Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-03-17

Re: [RFC v2 -next 2/2] virtio_net: Read the advised MTU

From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Date: 2016-03-17 21:20:10
Also in: lkml, virtualization

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

"Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:04:13PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
quoted
This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it
exists, read the advised MTU and use it.

No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the
negotiated MTU. A future commit will add proper error handling. Instead, a
warning is emitted if the guest changes the device MTU after previously
being given advice.
I don't see this as an error. Device might at best give a hint,
user/network admin always knows best.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <redacted>
---
v2:
* Whitespace cleanup in the last hunk
* Code style change around the pr_warn
* Additional test for mtu change before printing warning

 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 767ab11..429fe01 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ struct virtnet_info {
 	virtio_net_ctrl_ack ctrl_status;
 	u8 ctrl_promisc;
 	u8 ctrl_allmulti;
+	bool negotiated_mtu;
 };
 
 struct padded_vnet_hdr {
@@ -1390,8 +1391,11 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops virtnet_ethtool_ops = {
 
 static int virtnet_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
 {
+	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
 	if (new_mtu < MIN_MTU || new_mtu > MAX_MTU)
 		return -EINVAL;
+	if ((vi->negotiated_mtu) && (dev->mtu != new_mtu))
+		pr_warn("changing mtu while the advised mtu bit exists.");
I don't really see why are we warning here. Just drop this chunk,
as well as the flag in struct virtnet_info.
Okay. I was warning because the user is changing this after telling to
use something different - but if you don't think it's an error, I will
drop it.

Thanks so much for the review, Michael!

-Aaron
quoted
 	dev->mtu = new_mtu;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1836,6 +1840,13 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ))
 		vi->has_cvq = true;
 
+	if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU)) {
+		vi->negotiated_mtu = true;
+		dev->mtu = virtio_cread16(vdev,
+					  offsetof(struct virtio_net_config,
+						   mtu));
+	}
+
 	if (vi->any_header_sg)
 		dev->needed_headroom = vi->hdr_len;
 
@@ -2019,6 +2030,7 @@ static unsigned int features[] = {
 	VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ,
 	VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR,
 	VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT,
+	VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU,
 };
 
 static struct virtio_driver virtio_net_driver = {
-- 
2.5.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help